'Telangana movement based on pack of lies'

Sep 18, 2013, 07.13AM IST TNN

GUNTUR: Terming resignations of ministers and ruling Congress leaders as 'bogus', Visalandhra Mahasabha leader Parakala Prabhakar on Tuesday appealed to students to put up a united struggle to keep the state united. Agitations being carried out by various sections of people in Seemandhra region should become an inspiration for any democratic movement in the world, he said.

Addressing a mammoth gathering of students, lawyers and doctors at the 'Mande Gundela Ghosha' meeting here on Tuesday, Prabhakar alleged that the Telangana movement was based on pack of lies and false claims.

While reiterating that the division of the state would spell disaster to all regions in the state, he criticised Telangana leaders for 'dumping' the issue of backwardness of the region after the Srikrishna committee negated their false claims.

Consequently, Telangana leaders are now demanding a separate state on the plank of self-rule and self-respect, he added. Vignan educational institutions chairman L Rathaiah also blamed the congress high command for taking the state for a ride. All political parties made a 'mistake' by not taking people of Seemandhra into confidence, he said. "People's revolution in Seemandhra brings back memories of freedom struggle," he added.

IMA former president N Kishore, advocates JAC leader Brahma Reddy, and student JAC leader M V Ramana also spoke. With thousands of students turning up at the meeting near Sri Potti Sriramulu statue, traffic in the city went haywire for several hours. 

 

http://m.timesofindia.com/city/hyderabad/Telangana-movement-based-on-pack-of-lies/articleshow/22681898.cms

 

Fraud Nizam Telangana: State Emblems and Flags, Andhra Pradesh

Excellent video by Vepachedu Muralidhar on the fraud being played by Separatists! Must watch by everyone.

1001 Lies Told In The Name of Telangana

Well, it may not be 1001 reasons.....but you get the picture!

Here goes the list of lies, untruths, propaganda unleashed by Separatists a.k.a TRS a.k.a TJAC. Each of them has been proven to be false:

First, they said Telangana is 'backward'
>Sri Krishna Committee spent almost a year touring the entire state of Andhra Pradesh and all districts. They met representatives of all - employees, students, farmers, politicians etc. They met experts with economic and administrative experience. They went through the district level data for all parameters including literacy, GDP, agriculture, irrigation, per capita income etc. This is the conclusion they came to after their survey of all districts:

1. The SKC remarked that "It is a fact that most of the economic and developmental parameters show that Telangana (excluding Hyderabad city but including Hyderabad suburbs) is either on par with or a shade lower than Coastal Andhra. (2.15.03 on Page 119)
2. In comparison with the Rayalaseema region, the SKC remarked that "Thus, on the whole, it would appear that the deprived region is Rayalaseema not Telangana" (2.15.03 on Page 119)

And, the most preferred option:
"Keeping the State united and providing for creation of a statutorily empowered Telangana Regional Council for socio­-economic development and political development of Telangana region."

Then, they said they want it for 'Self Respect' 
>In a democratic country who stole their self respect? Is it KCR? Is it their politicians?

Then they said they want it for'Self Rule'
>I dont understand this. Do they mean to say they dont recognize the Indian Union?!!! As citizens, they are free to vote and elect any party of their choice.

Then they said its because it was already developed when AP was formed. "Seemandhra people 'looted' Telangana since 1956", they said.
> Is it backward or developed - first decide that! Initially didn't they say it was backward?
Since Hyderabad is capital of the state of AP, people from all disctricts of the state migrated here in search of a livelihood and settled here in the last 60 years. This was largely because there was no major source of employment in other parts of the state; Hyderabad was and still is the major economic engine of the state. This is very common, has happened all over the country. Examples, Mumbai in Maharashtra, Chennai in Tamil Nadu etc Is this called looting?

Then they said they want it because it is liberated from India. They didn't want to join Indian Union (Weirdest reason!)
>Post liberation and integration of dominions of Ex Hyderabad state into Indian Union, districts with Telugu speaking people in Madras, and Hyderabad states were combined to form Andhra Pradesh state. Now separatists are claiming the legacy of ex ruler of Hyderabad Nizam! Amazing because Telangana people fought the tyrannical Nizam (Telangana Sayudha Poratam) and his loyal servants the mostly Velama and Reddy Doras (zamindars). In this fight they received moral and physical support from Andhra communists.

To be continued...

Read The Samaikyandhra Daily

http://paper.li/vox_populi2020/1378044503

So after all it is true - Telangana to have separate capital! Warangal?

64.5% of voters said that Telangana was not good for India!

If majority people don't want Andhra Pradesh to be bifurcated, then why is Congress party going against people's wishes?!!!

For votes?!!! For petty reasons? Electoral considerations?


From Wall Street Journal

Excerpts:

"In a poll on India Real Time, 64.5% of voters said that Telangana was not good for India. Around 28.3% voted in favor of the new state and 7.2% said they didn’t care when asked whether Telangana was good for India."

http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2013/08/01/what-you-said-the-state-of-telangana/

Sign Online Petition To Sonia Gandhi - Stop Bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh - Avaaz.org

Stop This Madness Now, Don't Bifurcate Andhra Pradesh!

The state of Andhra Pradesh (AP) is being divided without any rational basis. UPA govt promised to constitute 2nd States Reorganization Commission (SRC) in 2004 to look into the demands for new states. However, without doing so, the current UPA govt. has abruptly announced it's intention of dividing AP by creating Telangana. What prompted the sudden decision? Is it that elections are round the corner and hence this has been done with a view to gather votes in Telangana?

Why AP should NOT be divided?

1. Majority of people in Andhra Pradesh do not want the state to be bifurcated. People of all three regions in AP – Rayalaseema, Coastal Andhra and Telangana have contributed to the development of the capital city Hyderabad. But separatists in Telangana are claiming Hyderabad for new state instead of having a new capital. They want new state but not new capital! Along with this, they are asking non-Telangana people to leave Hyderabad. All recently formed states like Chattisgarh, Jharkhand have adopted new capitals for their new states. They didn’t insist on adopting existing capital cities like Bhopal and Patna.

2. Initially backwardness was stated as the reason for separate state for Telangana. The Srikrishna Commission constituted by UPA spent a year looking at length the socio economic conditions in all three regions of AP. They concluded that Telangana’s per capita income even without Hyderabad was Rs. 33,771 while Rayalseema stood at Rs. 33,056. Coastal Andhra was the highest at Rs. 36,496. This shows Rayalaseema is the most backward region in AP. Doesn’t it follow that UPA should actually create a new Rayalaseema state if backwardness is the criteria?

3. Indeed, division of a large state like AP without a rational economic or administrative basis can prove dangerous for the country. There are numerous demands across the country for new states including Gorkhaland in West Bengal, Vidarbha in Maharashtra, Bundelkhand, Harit Pradesh in UP, Saurashtra in Gujarat, Bodoland in Assam etc. Why are those demands not being considered? Why is it that Maharashtra or UP or Gujarat etc. not being divided along with AP? Why not Maharashtra first? It is a bigger state

By succumbing to the demand for Telangana state, Central govt. is setting a dangerous precedent - anyone can indulge in violence and few 'fast-unto-death' dharnas for a week and get a new state. This is what is happening in Andhra Pradesh. This way govt will have to create at least 20 new states, with or without legitimate reasons ----- country will break up soon. Please stop this.

I urge all right thinking Indians to support this petition and STOP this madness called 'Bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh' now! It's now or never.

https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Stop_this_Madness_Now_Dont_Bifurcate_Andhra_Pradesh/

What did Dasarathi Rangacharya say on Telangana?

Dasarathi Rangacharya's Interview - Open Heart with RK on ABN Andhra Jyothi Channel

Interesting, please read....


English Translation of essential portions from the interview:

1. Quli Qutb Shah ruled whole of today's Andhra Pradesh (CE 1580 to 1611)
2. He called this WHOLE region Telangana 
That is, Telangana at that time meant land of Telugu speaking people which is Rayalaseema, Coastal Andhra & today's Telangana.
In simple words, whole of today's Andhra Pradesh was called Telangana at that time.
3. Over a period of time, what remained of that Telangana is the 10 districts which you see today
4. Many tried to create mischief in the name of Telangana
5. Chenna Reddy and Ranga Reddy sold themselves for official positions in 1969
6. Telangana people asked for Visalandhra state first. Others asked only for Andhra state

Well, well,.....so TRS-TJAC-OU mafia which was peddling lies as history stand exposed again! They can't deny any of the above especially since it's an eminent Telanganite who said this. Of course, this is history....what actually happened. But which TRS & co never accepted and tried to twist facts and rewrite history.

Those who try to build a future on falsehoods, will see their present destroyed!

Original interview (in Telugu) - ePaper:
http://epaper.andhrajyothy.com/PUBLICATIONS/AJ/AJYOTHI/2013/09/11/ArticleHtmls/11092013101012.shtml?Mode=1#

Original interview ABN Video:

Online Petition Started - Stop this Madness Now .... Don't Bifurcate Andhra Pradesh!

Friends,

I just created a new petition and I hope you can sign -- it's called: Stop this Madness Now .... Don't Bifurcate Andhra Pradesh!

This issue is very important to all Indians, and together we can do something about it!

Read more about it and sign it here:
http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/Stop_this_Madness_Now_Dont_Bifurcate_Andhra_Pradesh/?eDoexfb

Campaigns like this always start small, but they grow when people like us get involved -- please take a second right now to help out by signing and passing it on.

Thanks so much

What is there in 8th chapter of Sri Krishna Committee Report?

Answer: Sri Krishna Committee suggested to Union of India not to accede to the demand for Telangana.

Then, why did UPA govt announce that it is going ahead with formation of Telangana state?

Extract from Wikipedia:
**************************************************************************
On 23 March, Justice L Narasimha Reddy of Andhra Pradesh high court ordered central government to make contents of 8th chapter of Sri Krishna Committee, which was submitted in a sealed secret cover to the centre.[64] Justice in his 60 page judgement said "The Committee travelled beyond the terms of reference in its endeavour to persuade the Union of India not to accede to the demand for Telangana". SKC secret report as quoted in paras 68-72, argued against Telangana state while discussing communal violence, Maoist violence and social tensions. The supplementary note to secret report has three parts, ..

    "a) Political management: Action also needs to be initiated for softening the TRS to the extent possible .. Inputs indicate that this agitation can be tackled if Congress Leaders do not give an impression indicating any covert / overt support to it. Hence the Congress MPs / MLAs need to be taken into confidence and asked not to lend any form of support to the agitation. The Congress High Command must sensitize its own MPs and MLAs and educate them about the wisdom for arriving at an acceptable and workable solution. With the ruling party and main opposition party (for Telangana demand) being brought on the same page, the support mechanisms have a higher probability of becoming successful."(para 75)

    "b) Media Management: ..Andhra Pradesh has got about 13 Electronic Channels and 5 major local Newspapers which are in the forefront of molding the public opinion. Except for two Channels (Raj News & hmtv), the rest of them are supporters of a united Andhra Pradesh. The equity holders of the channels except the above two and the entire Print Media are with the Seemandhra people. The main editors/resident and sub-editors, the Film world etc. are dominated by Seemandhra people. A coordinated action on their part has the potential of shaping the perception of the common man. ..In the Print Media all major Newspapers are owned by Seemandhra people and the Regional contents published by them play a vital role. .. The editorial opinions, the banner headlines, the Regional content, the District editions need to be managed .." (para 80). “The print media is hugely dependent on the Government for advertisement revenue and if carefully handled can be an effective tool to achieve this goal”. (para 91)

    c) Full preparedness: As under each of the options there is a high possibility of agitational backlash, notwithstanding the actions taken in advance as suggested in (a) and (b) above, an appropriate plan of deployment grid of police force (both Central and State) with full technical support needs to be immediately drawn up. ..The likely troubled spots (e.g. Osmania, Kakatiya, Krishna Devraya Universities etc.) and the trouble creators in the three regions must be identified in advance and suitable action plan prepared. In my discussions with Chief Secretary and DGP, the kind of equipment and weaponry to be used were also discussed and it was agreed that weaponry used should be such as not to cause fatal injuries, while at the same time effective enough to bring the agitationists quickly under control. ”(para 94)
**************************************************************************

Doesn't this mean that
1. There is no popular support for new state in Telangana
2. Violence was expected from separatist lobby
3. Because violence was expected govt was supposed to be extra cautious
4. Cases should have been booked against extreme elements in the forefront. Like KCR who said "Telangana wale jago, Andhra wale bhago". Why is Prof. Kodandaram not sacked from his job in Osmania University as he is primarily leading a political movement being a govt employee? Why were cases not initiated against TRS and TJAC for assaulting & provoking people and damaging vehicles and properties in Hyderabad and elsewhere?

Why didn't the State and Central govts act on this report and in particular Chapter 8?

Why did the UPA govt not follow the advice of Sri Krishna Committee not to divide Andhra Pradesh? A committee which it had constituted in the first place! Congress Party has to explain to the country and to the people of Andhra Pradesh.

Is it just for political expediency, keeping one eye on coming elections? Is it to weaken it's rivals TDP and YSRCP?

Here's the link to Sri Krishna Committee Report:
http://mha.nic.in/pdfs/CCSAP-REPORT-060111.pdf

Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_for_Consultations_on_the_Situation_in_Andhra_Pradesh