AP Montage

AP Montage
Showing posts with label Telangana Lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Telangana Lies. Show all posts

Thursday, October 31, 2013

101 Lies & Dubious Arguments Of #Telangana Separatists - Lie #5

Lie #5: Nehru was against Telangana’s merger with Andhra.


Jawaharlal Nehru was never against the formation of Visalandhra, contrary to the propaganda by the separatists. Nehru was initially against splitting the Hyderabad State, which consisted of Telugu, Kannada, and Marathi speaking areas, since he thought the State represented his idea of unity in diversity.

However, when the principle of carving out states on linguistic basis was accepted, he was very vocal in supporting the demand for creation of Visalandhra by merging Andhra state and the Telugu-speaking regions of the Hyderabad state. In the Selected Works of Jawaharlal Nehru that has transcript of Nehru’s speech given in Nizamabad public meeting, he said the following:

“This decision has been arrived at after prolonged discussions with both sides and great care
has been taken to see that feelings on either side are not exacerbated. The people of
Andhra and Telangana have to lead their lives and progress as parts of the larger entity,
India. Therefore, petty arguments and tensions will lead nowhere. I hope all of you will
accept this new proposal wholeheartedly and put it into practice. I want that you should
become a part of greater Andhra and benefit by it.”

101 Lies & Dubious Arguments Of #Telangana Separatists - Lie #4

Lie # 4: Andhra Mahasabha was an organization run by the people of Coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema


This is untrue and again part of separatist propaganda. In the early 1900s there were two organizations: one was Andhra Mahasabha led by Coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema leaders and the other was Nizam Andhra Mahasabha led by Telangana stalwarts like Suravaram Pratap Reddy, Andhra Pitamaha Madapati Hanumantha Rao, Ravi Narayana Reddy, Burgula Ramakrishna Rao and several others.

It is the Nizam Andhra Mahasabha under the leadership of communists that led the armed peasant uprising against Nizam’s tyrannical rule.

101 Lies & Dubious Arguments Of #Telangana Separatists - Lie #3

Lie #3: Telangana under the rule of Nizam had no relations with Andhra, which was under British rule.


Despite different political dispensations across regions during British and Nizam rule, the Telugu people yearned for one administrative and political unit, since their cultural and social
unity continued to be as strong as ever. In Andhra Pitamaha Maadapati Hanumantha Rao Jeevita Charitra there is a reference to Nawab Aliyavar Jung, a senior official in the Nizam Government,
saying to Sri Madapati Hanumanth Rao: “it came to our government’s notice that the purpose of your Andhra movement is to merge the Andhra districts of Madras and the Andhra districts in Nizam’s dominion”.

Nizam has given incentives to people of coastal region by a firmana and encouraged them to come and settle in Nizamabad, Adilabad, and Warangal under the then newly constructed irrigation projects. The Telangana Armed Struggle attests to the fact that the shared cultural heritage was the prime reason for working together of peoples on either side of the artificial borders to bring down the Nizam regime. Many leading lights of the undivided Communist Party of India from Andhra and Rayalaseema regions such as Chandra Rajeswara Rao, P Sundarayya, M Basavapunnaiah and
Tammareddy Satyanarayana played crucial role in the historic Telangana Armed Struggle and acted in concert with the leaders from the Nizam region like Ravi Narayana Reddy, Devulapalli Venkateswara Rao, Bhimreddy Narasimha Reddy, Makhdoom, and Baddam Yellareddy. Many leaders of the Andhra unit of the Communist Party led the guerrilla squads during the Telangana struggle.

For example, Kasani Narayana acknowledged that the marching song of the then Telangana fighters – “Telugu talli biddalam, Telangana veerulam, Matrudesa mukti koraku porusalpa kadilinaam” (We the children of Telugu maatha, warriors from Telangana, fighting for the liberation of motherland are on a warpath) was composed by Sunkara Satyanarayana, a communist writer and fighter from Krishna district of coastal Andhra. It is the same Sunkara Satyanarayana who, along with Vasireddy Bhaskara Rao wrote the magnificent and popular play ‘Maa Bhoomi’ (Our Land) in 1947. It inspired millions of people (mainly in Telangana but also in Andhra) into anti-feudal struggles. The Praja Natya Mandali troupe which staged this play had artists mostly from the coastal Andhra region. The
play was performed in border areas of Andhra (as it was not permitted in Telangana) to enable the people from Telangana districts to watch. “All these factors emphasise the nature of the Telangana struggle, namely that it was the concerted action of the leaders of both the units of the Communist Party of India in Telangana and Andhra” wrote P R Rao in his book History of Modern Andhra.
The separatists would not even like to mention about the glorious Telangana Armed Struggle because it was a fine example of the oneness of all Telugus.

101 LIES & DUBIOUS ARGUMENTS OF #TELANGANA SEPARATISTS - Lie #2

Lie #2: There was communal harmony during Nizam’s rule which was disturbed after the formation of Andhra Pradesh state



Muslims dominated the state administration during Nizam rule. Of the 1.7 Crore people living in the Hyderabad state, roughly twenty lakhs, about 12% were Muslims. Despite their small numbers,
Muslims held 90% of the army and police jobs and occupied more than 80% of the government administrative jobs. The religious discrimination was so rampant that, in the railway stations of Hyderabad, there used to be two separate refreshment rooms labeled “Moslem Tea Room” and “Hindu Tea Room” according to a Time Magazine article that came out in August 1948 titled The Holdout.

Anjuman Thabli Gulislam, a religious organization supported by Nizam, actively converted poor and downtrodden Hindus to Islam. To counter these conversion activities, Arya Samaj formed an organization called Shuddhi Sabha. As a result, there was considerable hostility between these two religious groups. Muslims were the rulers. They dominated the administration, and the cultural and intellectual spheres. The majority of the subjects in the Hyderabad State had to bear the domination silently because of their powerlessness. Their meek and silent endurance of brutal dominance by despotic rulers cannot be described as communal harmony. Absence of violent protest by the Hindus against the muslim domination cannot be termed as communal peace.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Unknown History Of Andhra Telangana Golkonda Hyderabad With Sangam Pushpa Sambi Reddy

This person has done a lot of research to come up with some previously unknown facts. She has pored through old books, maps located in the great libraries of UK and US.

For Example: The word Telangana actually came from Telingana....which actually came from Trilingadesa meaning the land between the three great siva temples. Doesnt include Hyderabad or most contemporary districts.

Must watch, see this video of ABN Telugu news channel's interview of Sangam Pushpa Sambi Reddy.
 


 

101 LIES & DUBIOUS ARGUMENTS OF #TELANGANA SEPARATISTS - Lie #1

101 LIES & DUBIOUS ARGUMENTS OF TELANGANA SEPARATISTS


Lie #1: "Telangana was a separate entity for 2200 years out of 2500 years of Telugu history"


Historically, this is untrue. From Satavahanas and Kakatiyas (A.D. 1162 – 1323) to
the Vijayanagara Rayas (A.D. 1336 – 1565), Qutub Shahis (A.D. 1518 – 1687) and
the Nizams (A.D. 1720 – 1948), Telugus were ruled as a single political entity for a
large part of history. Even if you take the Muslim rule which is the recent past, most
of the present day Andhra Pradesh was under the suzerainty of one political power.

In A.D.1766, the Nizam signed a treaty with the British, whereby in return for the
Northern Circars (most of the Coastal Andhra region- which was initially given to the
French), the British agreed to furnish Nizam Ali Khan with a subsidiary force as and
when required. As per another treaty, he surrendered the Guntur circar in A.D.1788. Yet another treaty was signed by the Nizam In A.D.1800 with the British to cede an area comprising the districts of Rayalaseema and Bellary (now in Karnataka).

Even though different kings ruled different parts of the Telugu-speaking region albeit for brief periods, we cannot use historical balkanization to buttress arguments for dividing the state. This argument is as good as saying, India, which was ruled by 500 different kings and nawabs in pre-Independence era, should have as many states.

It is an undeniable fact that the entire Andhra Pradesh of the present day shared similar cultural and
linguistic features all through the history, notwithstanding being under different political dispensations for brief spells.

See maps:







Courtesy: Visalandhra Mahasabha

REFUTING AN AGITATION: 101 LIES & DUBIOUS ARGUMENTS OF TELANGANA SEPARATISTS - Part1

REFUTING AN AGITATION: 

101 LIES & DUBIOUS ARGUMENTS OF TELANGANA SEPARATISTS - Part 1

http://www.myteluguroots.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Refuting-An-Agitation.pdf


Extracts from the book published by Visalandhra Mahasabha

Introduction
This book is an effort to carefully examine the claims, assertions, and allegations that are made by the
separatists in Telangana. These have gone unexamined for a long time. Therefore, they went unchallenged and unquestioned. Not only those who want the state to be divided believed them to be true but also those who are opposed to the division thought initially that there might be a grain of truth in them. We do not know what the purveyors of these claims and allegations thought about them when they brought them into circulation. Did genuinely think that they were true? Or they just propagated them to serve their separatist agenda?

If they genuinely thought that their allegations and claims were true, this book will give them the
correct picture. They should then have no problem in reexamining their argument and revising their position. But if they deliberately distorted the facts to advance their partisan agenda, this book will expose them and call their bluff. We do hope that they reexamine their position in the light of the facts presented in this work. Victimhood evokes sympathy. Telangana separatists repeated their allegations, claims and assertions in concert. They wrote continuously and propagated tirelessly that Telangana region was discriminated against, exploited, humiliated, and insulted. Those who did not have time or opportunity to verify these claims and allegations took them to be true. And as a consequence they found themselves in sympathy with the separatist cause. This is one of the reasons why in Delhi and elsewhere in the country many columnists, political commentators, and several prominent persons in the media and NGO sectors thought that they were lending their support to a deserving cause. Some political parties and their leaders, despite being unfamiliar with the realities in the state of Andhra Pradesh and in Telangana, also extended their support to what they thought was a genuine cause. But, as it turned out, it was uncritical acceptance of claims, undeserving
sympathy for a cause and unthinking support for a demand. We hope that those who accepted the separatists’ claims at face value will carefully examine and evaluate the narrative that we are presenting in this book.

The separatists began their agitation with the claim that Telangana region has been neglected, that it was backward, and that it was exploited. That was the overture to their concert of propaganda. They were emphatic about their claims as long as those claims went unchallenged. Nalamotu Chakravarthy’s book My Telugu Roots was perhaps the first work that challenged those claims of economic exploitation and backwardness. His book conclusively showed that the region is not backward (no more backward or no less prosperous than any other region in the state) and in fact has registered impressive growth in every sector of economic activity since the formation of Andhra Pradesh state in 1956.

That Chakravarthy hails from Telangana region is significant. Separatists could not tarnish his work as a biased interpretation of data by someone unsympathetic to the interests of his own region. They could not come up with a cogent rebuttal of his argument. Therefore, a cowardly physical assault on Chakravarthy was the only thing that they could do to lend force to their claims. They began to lose their cool as they began to lose their argument.

Justice Srikrishna Committee also rubbished the ‘economic backwardness – exploitation’ argument in its report. This marked the final demise of the economic argument of separatists. The argument that jobs of Telangana people were taken away, that there was theft of irrigation water, and that the successive governments neglected the region, that agreements were violated and other related claims and allegations were proved to be simply incorrect and untrue.

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Telangana movement based on pack of lies

'Telangana movement based on pack of lies'

Sep 18, 2013, 07.13AM IST TNN

GUNTUR: Terming resignations of ministers and ruling Congress leaders as 'bogus', Visalandhra Mahasabha leader Parakala Prabhakar on Tuesday appealed to students to put up a united struggle to keep the state united. Agitations being carried out by various sections of people in Seemandhra region should become an inspiration for any democratic movement in the world, he said.

Addressing a mammoth gathering of students, lawyers and doctors at the 'Mande Gundela Ghosha' meeting here on Tuesday, Prabhakar alleged that the Telangana movement was based on pack of lies and false claims.

While reiterating that the division of the state would spell disaster to all regions in the state, he criticised Telangana leaders for 'dumping' the issue of backwardness of the region after the Srikrishna committee negated their false claims.

Consequently, Telangana leaders are now demanding a separate state on the plank of self-rule and self-respect, he added. Vignan educational institutions chairman L Rathaiah also blamed the congress high command for taking the state for a ride. All political parties made a 'mistake' by not taking people of Seemandhra into confidence, he said. "People's revolution in Seemandhra brings back memories of freedom struggle," he added.

IMA former president N Kishore, advocates JAC leader Brahma Reddy, and student JAC leader M V Ramana also spoke. With thousands of students turning up at the meeting near Sri Potti Sriramulu statue, traffic in the city went haywire for several hours. 
 
http://m.timesofindia.com/city/hyderabad/Telangana-movement-based-on-pack-of-lies/articleshow/22681898.cms
 

Fraud Nizam Telangana: State Emblems and Flags, Andhra Pradesh

Excellent video by Vepachedu Muralidhar on the fraud being played by Separatists! Must watch by everyone.




1001 Lies Told In The Name of Telangana


Well, it may not be 1001 reasons.....but you get the picture!

Here goes the list of lies, untruths, propaganda unleashed by Separatists a.k.a TRS a.k.a TJAC. Each of them has been proven to be false:

First, they said Telangana is 'backward'
>Sri Krishna Committee spent almost a year touring the entire state of Andhra Pradesh and all districts. They met representatives of all - employees, students, farmers, politicians etc. They met experts with economic and administrative experience. They went through the district level data for all parameters including literacy, GDP, agriculture, irrigation, per capita income etc. This is the conclusion they came to after their survey of all districts:

  1. The SKC remarked that "It is a fact that most of the economic and developmental parameters show that Telangana (excluding Hyderabad city but including Hyderabad suburbs) is either on par with or a shade lower than Coastal Andhra. (2.15.03 on Page 119)
  2. In comparison with the Rayalaseema region, the SKC remarked that "Thus, on the whole, it would appear that the deprived region is Rayalaseema not Telangana" (2.15.03 on Page 119)

And, the most preferred option:
"Keeping the State united and providing for creation of a statutorily empowered Telangana Regional Council for socio­-economic development and political development of Telangana region."

Then, they said they want it for 'Self Respect' 
>In a democratic country who stole their self respect? Is it KCR? Is it their politicians?

Then they said they want it for'Self Rule'
>I dont understand this. Do they mean to say they dont recognize the Indian Union?!!! As citizens, they are free to vote and elect any party of their choice.

Then they said its because it was already developed when AP was formed. "Seemandhra people 'looted' Telangana since 1956", they said.
> Is it backward or developed - first decide that! Initially didn't they say it was backward?
Since Hyderabad is capital of the state of AP, people from all disctricts of the state migrated here in search of a livelihood and settled here in the last 60 years. This was largely because there was no major source of employment in other parts of the state; Hyderabad was and still is the major economic engine of the state. This is very common, has happened all over the country. Examples, Mumbai in Maharashtra, Chennai in Tamil Nadu etc Is this called looting?

Then they said they want it because it is liberated from India. They didn't want to join Indian Union (Weirdest reason!)
>Post liberation and integration of dominions of Ex Hyderabad state into Indian Union, districts with Telugu speaking people in Madras, and Hyderabad states were combined to form Andhra Pradesh state. Now separatists are claiming the legacy of ex ruler of Hyderabad Nizam! Amazing because Telangana people fought the tyrannical Nizam (Telangana Sayudha Poratam) and his loyal servants the mostly Velama and Reddy Doras (zamindars). In this fight they received moral and physical support from Andhra communists.

To be continued...